1.
Rating of the conference
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Not Applicable
Promotion and administration prior to the event
Conference venue / catering
Time and duration of the conference
Conference documentation
Plenary sessions
Workshops
Structure of the workshops
Quality of the presentations
Panel debate
Info market
Networking opportunities
Quality of the overall conference
2.
Why did you decide to take part in the Mechelen conference?
3.
Did the conference fulfil these expectations?
Very
Partially
Not so much
4.
Which keynote speech or workshop was most interesting / inspiring for you?
5.
Do you think it relevant to pursue international cooperation concerning voluntary work in the field of heritage?
Very
Partially
Not so much
6.
Did you maintain contact with other participants after the conference?
7.
Did the Mechelen conference change your perception and attitude towards heritage and active citizenship?
Very
Partially
Not so much
8.
Will your participation in the conference have an impact on the activities of your organisation and its relationship with your government?
Very
Partially
Not so much
9.
Are you more convinced that the Framework-convention on the value of cultural heritage (Council of Europe, Faro, 2005) is of crucial importance for inspiring heritage policies in European countries?
Very
Partially
Not so much
10.
Follow-up conference
Yes
No
Maybe
Should this conference become a returning event?
Would you be interested to attend this kind of conference in the future?
Would you be interested to present your own activities/projects?
Would you be interested in coorganising or hosting a future conference?
11.
If you think the conference should become a returning event, what would be a good frequency (annual, biannual…)?
12.
Where should these conferences be held in the future?
13.
Which topics deserve by priority specific attention at future conferences?
14.
Other suggestions / feedback:
Survey Software
powered by SurveyGizmo
